Euthanasia is Morally Wrong :: Against Euthanasia

The matter of mercy killing continues to be a contentious issue within todays society. Over the past years, at that place have been a slew of debates that have tried to justify the practice of assisted suicide, otherwise known as euthanasia. Gallups survey in 2007 served to instance this fact by showing that over 75 percent of Americans believe that euthanasia should be permitted. However, what Americans have failed to discern is that legalizing any form of euthanasia goes against the sanctitude of life and will result in no limitations to the justifications of why it is being performed. It seems as if society has become so debauched that the American citizenry frankly feel that they can condone ending the life of a precious individual. Perhaps in order for one to construct a fitting outdoor stage on euthanasia, one must be companionshipable on the philology and background of euthanasia, along with having a clear comprehension of some underlying terms. mercy killing is a t erm which derived from the Greek word euthanatos, meaning simply a good death (Perri, 1996). This word is extremely vulnerable to the various interpretations of all people therefore, many people fall short when it comes to understanding the two distinct types of euthanasia. These two unique types are known as active and nonoperational euthanasia. agile euthanasia is described as being the deliberate ending of a persons life with the intent of reducing that persons pain (Perri, 1996). For instance, active euthanasia can be as simple as injecting a patient with a harmful toxin. On the other hand passive euthanasia is typically defined as the withdrawing of medical treatment with the intention of causing the patients death (Types of euthanasia, 2001). Now an example of passive euthanasia is simply when a patient is perishing and the doctor choices not to recover them. Now it is imperative that one recognizes the distinction between active and passive euthanasia. Another aspect in wh ich euthanasia can be classified is as involuntary or voluntary. Involuntary euthanasia is when a patients life is ended without the patients knowledge and consent (Types of euthanasia, 2001). A perceptible example of involuntary euthanasia is when a patient is in a coma and does not have the potentiality to decide what should happen to him. Lastly, the subject of voluntary euthanasia is the patient requests that an action be taken to end his life, or that life-saving treatment be stopped, with full knowledge that this will lead to his death (Types of euthanasia, 2001).