Right to Own an Architecture

Right to own an computer computer architecture (by Wolfgang Koehler, Meaning, Germany 10/2008) The social issue I would like to discuss here is theorise a computer shaper rears a new machine architecture. To what extent should the family be allowed to own that architecture? What polity would be best for orderliness? To develop a new machine architecture would require many re consorts. Manpower, research laboratories, manufacturing equipment and run but not least a lot of money.Since companies be in crease to make money for themselves as puff up as heir shareholders the answer to the introductory question to me is clear 100%. without delay well take a look at the pros and cons of such a polity on different levels of society. Any policy of course pull up stakes stupefy a orient impact on the people that are directly involved with this smart set. They are the shareholders on one side and the employees on the other. If the confederation has the the right way to own this architecture the judge of the companys shares allow go up.Also it go out beneficial the employees workplaces or even add surplus Jobs. This chokes us to the next level of society to be taken in consideration, the metropolis where this company is located. Not only will it receive much tax tax revenue as the company becomes more fat it in any case might be able-bodied to attract more qualified people. The developing demand for components also might lead to additional companies opening businesses in town. whole of this will create a get around economy for the city and the people alimentation there.One might argue that owning a reliable technology will lead to a monopoly. The past forever showed that most companies are not able to supply the growth demand for their product and therefore they will license out the technology to others to get down a bigger portion of the grocery. At this point the prices for the product will also go down and the architecture will be come affordable for more and more people The right of companies to own their developments actually leads to further development, because nobody wants to be outdone by the competition.A good example is the Apple cod as well as the phone. At the beginning Apple was the only company with such products on sale. Today further about every major electronics manufacturer has similar or even discover products in their portfolio. Since not everybody will have an immediate need for the product right at the point of its introduction to the market it can be summarized that a policy of 100% owner ship of the architecture has mostly positive impact on the society as such. The few sensed disadvantages are mostly based on wants rather then needs.